/*
>>-119

Dear all,

After discuss with Amberly, I would like to clarify as follow:

1. First, what I would like to express in >>2:7 was to be more friendly to players, i.e. did not attack player herself, but I never wanted to affect others inference. In fact, I supported any types of questioning, but please be more kindly to players themselves.

However, due to my poor presentation, I found someone had misunderstanding about my word. I am sorry about that.

2. Next, I can guarantee that all my decisions were based on reasoning and I should never use the information I get from other place to affect my decisions, and that's also what I would like to clarify in >>3:-6.

3. Finally, as I would like to mix role playing and reasoning together, I would not act like player when the game was in process. However, I understood that this game was focusing on reasoning and I would never let my role play affect my decisions.

Therefore, I would like to clarify all of this as misunderstanding. Thanks for all the suggestions that you guys gave to me and I would review afterward.

Regards,
Rachel